Plasma surface treatment process and mechanism

Comprehensive guide on Plasma Surface Treatment for Modifying Surface Energy, improving bonding and adhesion strength

Introduction

Plasma surface treatment has emerged as a versatile technique for tailoring the wettability of material surfaces, enabling the creation of either hydrophilic or hydrophobic finishes on demand. “Hydrophilic” surfaces have high surface energy and attract water (low contact angle), whereas “hydrophobic” surfaces have low surface energy and repel water (high contact angle). At a molecular level, achieving these states often involves altering the surface functional groups or topology. Low-temperature plasma processes (often termed cold plasmas) are widely used in research and industry to modify surface chemistry without affecting bulk properties. Exposing a material to plasma can clean the contaminants of the surface, introduce new functional groups, and even deposit thin films, thereby dramatically changing surface energy. This ability to precisely control surface wettability is critical in fields ranging from biomedical implants to microfluidic lab-on-a-chip devices and advanced coatings.

This article reviews how plasma treatments create hydrophilic or hydrophobic surfaces on different materials. We discuss the molecular-level changes induced in metals (like titanium, aluminum), oxides (silicon dioxide glass), and polymers (polycarbonate, PET). We compare different plasma gas chemistries – for example, oxygen vs. argon vs. nitrogen vs. air plasmas – and how each interacts with surfaces to modify surface energy. The distinctions between vacuum (low-pressure) plasma and atmospheric plasma processes are also examined regarding mechanisms, effectiveness, and practical applications. In addition, we address the aging (hydrophobic recovery) of plasma-treated surfaces, explaining why the wettability changes can be temporary and how to mitigate reversion. Finally, application examples in biomedical devices, Bio-MEMS/lab-on-chip, biofunctional coatings, and adhesion promotion (e.g., epoxy bonding) are presented to illustrate the practical impact of plasma-induced surface energy modification. Table 1 summarizes common plasma gases, the reactive species they generate, and their typical effects on surfaces.

Plasma Surface Treatment Mechanisms and Plasma Gas Types

Plasma is an ionized gas consisting of a mixture of energetic electrons, ions, neutral atoms/molecules, and reactive radicals. When a surface is exposed to plasma, several processes can occur simultaneously: (1) high-energy ions and neutrals bombard the surface (physical sputtering/etching), (2) reactive radical species chemically react with surface atoms or adsorbates, and (3) UV photons emitted by the plasma can break chemical bonds at the surface. Through these mechanisms, plasma treatment alters the surface in two primary ways: it cleans/removes contaminants and functionalizes or restructures the surface, thereby changing the surface energy.
Different plasma feed gases produce different reactive species and thus different effects on the surface. Table 1 outlines four common plasma gases (oxygen, argon, nitrogen, and air) and their typical interactions with material surfaces:

Oxygen Plasma

• Reactive Species: O, O₂⁺, O⁻, O₃, electrons, UV photons
• Surface Effects:
  • Oxidative functionalization: breaks C–H bonds and adds oxygen-containing groups (carbonyl, carboxyl, ester, hydroxyl)
  • Removes organic contaminants via oxidation
  • Promotes hydroxyl (–OH) formation on oxide or metal surfaces
  • Greatly increases surface energy → highly hydrophilic surfaces
  • Can slightly etch or roughen some polymers

Argon (Ar) Plasma

• Reactive Species: Ar⁺ ions, Ar* metastable atoms, electrons
• Surface Effects:
  • Physical sputtering and activation via ion bombardment
  • Does not graft new chemical groups (inert), but creates free radicals/dangling bonds
  • Post-treatment exposure to air introduces –OOH, –OH groups → Increases hydrophilicity
  • Often used for metal activation with minimal oxidation
  • Induces cross-linking in polymers (from radical recombination)

Nitrogen (N₂) Plasma

• Reactive Species: N₂⁺, N atoms, nitrogen radicals, NHₓ (from moisture), electrons
• Surface Effects:
  • Nitrogenous functionalization: adds –NH₂, imine, or amide groups
  • Cleans organic contaminants
  • Increases surface energy (moderate hydrophilicity)
  • Improves biocompatibility and adds binding sites for biomolecules
  • Can nitride certain materials (e.g., Ti → TiN)

Air Plasma

• Reactive Species: O, N, O₂⁺, N₂⁺, NO, O₃, electrons, UV photons
• Surface Effects:
  • Combined oxidation and nitridation
  • Adds both oxygen and nitrogen functional groups
  • Effective for cleaning and activating surfaces in one step
  • Increases surface energy significantly
  • Removes carbon contaminants and hydroxylates metals (e.g., titanium → super hydrophilic)
  • Widely used for treating plastics, metals, glass; requires no bottled gases

Water Vapor Plasma

• Reactive Species: OH*, H*, O*, HO₂*, H₂O⁺, H⁺, OH⁺, O⁺, H₃O⁺, electrons, UV photons
• Surface Effects:
  • Enhances hydroxylation and oxidation
  • Increases surface energy and hydrophilicity
  • Atomic H: reduces and breaks organic bonds (polymer chain scission)
  • Atomic O: oxidizes like oxygen plasma
  • HO₂: moderate oxidant
  • Trace H₂O₂ may form downstream
  • UV photons assist in bond breaking and dissociation

CF₄ Plasma

• Reactive Species: CFₓ, atomic F, C atoms/clusters, CF₄⁺, CF₃⁺, CF₂⁺, F⁺, C⁺, CF₄*, CFₓ*, F*, electrons
• Surface Effects:
  • Commonly used to etch SiO₂, Si₃N₄, and doped glass (microfabrication)
  • Etches polymers by breaking C–H and C–C bonds
  • Fluorination forms volatile byproducts like CO, COF₂, CF₄
  • Can deposit fluorocarbon layers (–CF₂–, –CF₃) under low power
  • Surfaces become highly hydrophobic (contact angle > 100°)

The choice of plasma gas thus provides a toolkit to tailor surface chemistry. Oxygen plasma is generally considered the most effective for raising surface energy and achieving strong hydrophilicity. Nitrogen and ammonia plasmas are helpful when introducing desired amine functionality (for example, to bind biomolecules later). Inert gases like argon are preferred when only a gentle cleaning or activation is needed without unwanted chemical reactions (e.g., activating a metal surface while minimizing oxide growth). Air plasma, being readily available, offers a convenient compromise and often produces a mix of polar functional groups.
It’s important to note that plasma conditions (power, pressure, treatment time) also strongly influence the outcome. Higher powers or longer treatments generally increase the density of introduced functional groups up to a saturation point but may also cause more damage or roughness. Careful optimization is needed to achieve the desired hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity without degrading the material.

Molecular Changes in Different Materials: Metals, Oxides, and Polymers

Plasma treatments affect different classes of materials in distinct ways, largely because the baseline surface chemistry of metals, oxides, and polymers differ. Here we examine how plasma-induced hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity manifests at the molecular level for these materials, using titanium, aluminum, silicon oxide (glass), polycarbonate (PC), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) as representative examples.

Metals

Metals readily form native oxide layers when exposed to air. For example, titanium and aluminum surfaces are naturally covered by thin oxide films TiO₂ and Al₂O_3, respectively). These oxides largely determine the metal’s surface properties. A clean metal-oxide surface tends to be hydrophilic because metal oxides can bind polar molecules (like water) via surface –OH groups. However, in practice, metal surfaces often appear hydrophobic due to contamination: airborne hydrocarbons and organics adsorb on the oxide and render it low-energy. Plasma treatment can rejuvenate metal surfaces by both cleaning off contaminants and chemically modifying the oxide.

• Oxygen or Air Plasma on Metals: These plasmas will further oxidize and hydroxylate the metal surface. For titanium, low-temperature oxygen plasma was shown to enrich the. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of O₂ plasma-treated Ti alloys reveals an increase in Ti^4+ (in TiO₂) along with new hydroxyl groups on the surface, accompanied by a decrease in surface carbon​. The introduced –OH groups are highly polar and hydrogen-bond with water, giving a superhydrophilic character. Indeed, oxygen-plasma treated titanium often shows a near-zero water contact angle immediately after treatment​. Similarly, for aluminum, an oxidizing plasma can increase the thickness and hydroxylation of the alumina layer. The plasma cleans off any hydrophobic organics and leaves an –OH terminated Al₂O₃ surface, which is highly wettable. In both cases, the metal’s shiny appearance is unchanged (plasma is gentle enough not to roughen the metal noticeably), but chemically, the surface is transformed: hydrophobic hydrocarbons out, hydrophilic oxides in. This conversion greatly increases surface energy and is beneficial for processes like adhesive bonding or biomedical integration. For example, in biomedical implants, making a titanium surface superhydrophilic via plasma promotes protein adsorption and cell attachment​, improving biocompatibility.
• Inert (Argon) Plasma on Metals: Using an argon plasma on a metal will primarily clean the surface by knocking off contaminants without adding oxygen. This is useful if one wants an activated metal surface that is atomically clean but not further oxidized. Argon ion bombardment can sputter away adventitious carbon layers and leave a fresh metal surface. Such a surface, when exposed to ambient air, will quickly pick up a thin layer of oxide or hydroxyl anyway (unless kept in an inert atmosphere), so it becomes hydrophilic – but the key is that argon plasma avoids forming a thick oxide that might interfere with certain applications. A prime example is gold (Au) bonding: gold normally resists oxidation, but O₂ plasma can actually create a gold oxide (Au₂O₃) on the surface which was found to impede Au–Au bonding​. Argon plasma, by contrast, cleaned the gold surface without oxidizing it, leading to much stronger bonding​. For the same reason, argon plasma is also widely used to clean more reactive metals like silver or copper bonding pads prior to wire bonding. In some cases, argon is mixed with hydrogen to create a more reductive environment to prevent oxide formation. In summary, for metals, argon plasma yields a clean, high-energy surface with minimal chemical change to the underlying oxide; oxygen plasma yields an oxidized, hydroxylated surface. Both result in improved wettability (low contact angles) – e.g., plasma-cleaned glass or metal often has a water contact angle <10° vs tens of degrees before​– but the chemical state of the surface can differ (oxygen plasma introduces new oxide species, and argon plasma preserves base material).
• Plasma-Induced Hydrophobicity on Metals: Metals themselves have inherently high surface energy when clean (e.g., clean metal oxides are hydrophilic), so making a truly hydrophobic metallic surface usually requires adding a low-surface-energy coating. Plasma processes can achieve this by depositing hydrophobic films. For instance, a fluorocarbon plasma can coat a metal with a Teflon-like CFx layer​, or a plasma polymerization of a silane can graft a water-repellent silicone layer. Another approach is plasma-assisted grafting of hydrophobic molecules (like plasma activating a metal surface and then exposing it to a vapor of an organosilane that attaches). In summary, plasma can make metals more hydrophilic by cleaning/oxidation, whereas making them hydrophobic typically involves a two-step process: plasma activation followed by the deposition of low-surface-energy species​.

Oxides

Silicon dioxide (SiO₂) surfaces, such as glass, are polar in nature because of surface silanol (Si–OH) groups. A freshly cleaned glass (as in laboratory “piranha” etch or oxygen plasma cleaned) can be extremely hydrophilic, with water spreading out in a thin film (contact angle ~0°) due to dense –OH termination. However, glass easily becomes moderately hydrophobic if those –OH groups are lost or covered by contaminants. Plasma treatment is a common and effective way to maximize the hydrophilicity of glass and other oxide ceramics.

• Oxygen/Air Plasma on SiO_2: Oxygen plasma will strip away any organic contaminants on a glass surface and also generate additional silanol groups. The mechanism involves oxidative cleavage of Si–O–Si bonds at the extreme top layer or removal of –CH_x groups if any organics were present, followed by attachment of –OH from moisture or plasma byproducts. The result is a glass surface rich in –OH groups (high-energy sites)​. Such a surface is highly attractive to water molecules (via hydrogen bonding) and, therefore, shows strong hydrophilicity. For example, after a brief O₂  plasma, borosilicate glass that initially had a contact angle ~30° can drop to <10°​(virtually complete wetting). This treatment is widely used in microfabrication; for instance, in bonding glass to PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) for microfluidic devices, both surfaces are oxygen-plasma treated to become hydrophilic and reactive, allowing them to bond irreversibly via Si–O–Si linkages.
• Other Plasmas on Oxides: Using argon plasma on glass will mainly clean the surface. Argon can knock off adsorbates and likely activate some surface oxygen sites (creating dangling bonds that immediately snag moisture to become –OH). The net effect is also a more hydrophilic glass, though possibly a bit less than with oxygen plasma because argon doesn’t directly create –OH; it relies on post-exposure reaction with ambient humidity​. Nitrogen plasma on glass could, in principle, lead to some Si–N or silicon oxynitride formation on the surface. This is less common, but in substrates like indium tin oxide (ITO) or glass, some studies note that N₂ air plasmas can be very effective at cleaning and activating the surface for subsequent bonding or film deposition​. In general, any plasma that cleans off organics will restore the intrinsic hydrophilicity of an oxide surface by revealing or regenerating polar surface groups.
• Hydrophobic Coatings via Plasma: To make an oxide surface hydrophobic, one typically uses plasma for the deposition or grafting of hydrophobic layers. An example is plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) of organosilanes. For instance, a hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) plasma can deposit a monolayer or thin film that renders a glass superhydrophobic (similar in effect to silanization chemistry, but done in plasma). Fluorocarbon plasma coatings (as mentioned for metals) work equally well on glass to provide a low-energy topcoat. Another interesting approach is roughening the oxide and then coating it with a hydrophobic layer to achieve a Lotus-effect superhydrophobic surface. Plasma etching (e.g., with CF₄+O₂) can create nanoscale texture on SiO₂, and subsequent deposition of a fluorosilane yields a surface with a very high water contact angle (over 150°, water rolls off). In summary, oxides are easily made ultra-hydrophilic by plasma cleaning/oxidation, while achieving hydrophobicity requires adding hydrophobic chemistries via plasma processes.

Polymers

Polymeric materials (plastics) are typically hydrophobic in their native state – for example, polycarbonate has a water contact angle of around 80–90°, and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) around 70–80°​. This stems from their chemical composition: polymer surfaces often present non-polar groups (–CH3, phenyl rings, etc.) and lack hydrophilic functional groups. Plasma treatment is extremely useful for polymers because it can transform the surface chemistry without solvents or high temperatures. However, polymers are also more delicate – plasma can cause chain scission, crosslinking, or roughening. Let’s consider what happens at a molecular level for polymers like PC and PET under different plasmas:

• Oxygen Plasma on Polymers: Oxygen plasma is widely regarded as the most effective for increasing polymer surface energy​. The energetic O atoms and ions abstract hydrogen and break C–C bonds at the polymer surface, creating radical sites that immediately react with oxygen species. This leads to the introduction of a host of oxygen-containing functional groups on the polymer surface: carbonyl (C=O), carboxyl (–COOH), hydroxyl (–OH), peroxide (–OOH), ether (–C–O–C–), etc.​ For example, in PET (which contains ester linkages), oxygen plasma can break some of the ester bonds, yielding carboxylic acid and hydroxyl terminals on the surface. In polycarbonate (which has aromatic rings and carbonate linkages), plasma may open aromatic rings or cleave side chains, introducing phenolic –OH or various carbon–oxygen functionalities. XPS analysis typically shows a marked increase in O/C ratio on polymer surfaces after O₂ plasma. This chemical functionalization dramatically increases polarity and thus water wetting. Contact angles of polymers can drop from ~80° into tens or single-digit degrees after a sufficiently long oxygen plasma. Another example: oxygen plasma on PTFE (Teflon, normally extremely hydrophobic) cannot fully overcome the intrinsic low surface energy of the fluorocarbon, but it can roughen it; interestingly, increased roughness on PTFE actually made it more hydrophobic (Cassie-Baxter effect) despite some added oxygen​. Generally, however, for hydrocarbon-based polymers like PC and PET, O2 plasma renders them highly hydrophilic. The increase in surface energy improves adhesion of coatings, paints, or adhesives on the polymer. The trade-off is that prolonged exposure can erode the plastic or degrade its mechanical properties at the surface.
• Argon Plasma on Polymers: Argon, being inert, does not add new chemical groups directly. Instead, argon plasma modifies polymers by surface activation and slight morphological change. The ion bombardment can knock off weakly bound polymer fragments (cleaning) and create free radicals by bond scission. These free radicals often lead to cross-linking (neighboring radicals recombine to form covalent bonds, making a denser network at the surface). Cross-linking can stabilize a polymer surface against dissolution or wear. When the argon-activated polymer is taken out of the plasma chamber, the radical sites are highly reactive toward oxygen from air – thus over time (minutes to hours post-treatment) the surface picks up oxygen and forms peroxy and carbonyl groups​. One source notes that argon plasma’s long-lived radicals lead to formation of hydroperoxide (–OOH) groups upon exposure to air​. The end result is that argon plasma indirectly causes an oxidative functionalization, though typically to a lesser extent than a direct oxygen plasma. Argon plasma also often increases surface roughness slightly less than an equivalently energetic oxygen plasma (since argon does not chemically etch, it only sputters physically). The wettability improvement with argon plasma is well-documented: for example, polyolefins treated with Ar plasma show a lowered water contact angle, indicating increased hydrophilicity, though the effect may be somewhat weaker or require ambient air exposure to fully develop​. One advantage of argon is that it may induce more stable changes in some polymers due to cross-linking (which can slow down hydrophobic recovery, discussed later).
• Nitrogen (N2) Plasma on Polymers: Nitrogen plasma introduces nitrogen functional groups into the polymer surface. This can include amine groups (–NH₂), which are polar and often improve wettability, or other functionalities like nitriles (–C≡N) and amides, depending on the polymer structure and plasma conditions​. N2 plasma can also abstract hydrogen and create radicals similar to argon, some of which will terminate by reacting with nitrogen species. The net effect of N2 plasma is usually an increase in surface energy and moderate hydrophilization, though studies have found nuanced differences: e.g., for PDMS (silicone), nitrogen plasma did not make it quite as hydrophilic as oxygen plasma did, but the treated surface maintained its hydrophilicity longer (slower aging)​. In another comparison, PMMA treated with nitrogen plasma was actually more hydrophilic (contact angle ~30°) than the same treated with oxygen plasma (~40°)​, showing that effectiveness can be material-dependent. The presence of amino groups can be beneficial for further chemical modification – for instance, an –NH₂ group on a plasma-treated PET surface allows covalent coupling of biomolecules using glutaraldehyde chemistry. In summary, nitrogen plasmas provide an alternative route to hydrophilicity with different surface chemistry (introducing basic –NH_x groups instead of acidic –COOH, for example).
• Plasma-Deposited Hydrophobic Layers on Polymers: Polymers can also be made more hydrophobic using plasma, although their baseline is often hydrophobic to begin with. Plasma polymerization can deposit ultra-thin coatings that lower surface energy. A common technique is to use fluorocarbon plasmas (CF₄, C₂F₆, etc.) to coat the polymer in a fluorinated layer​. This is in effect like putting a Teflon coat on the surface, often resulting in water contact angles well above 100° (even approaching superhydrophobic if combined with surface texture). Another approach is plasma deposition of siloxanes or other hydrocarbons that leave a hydrophobic film. For example, depositing a thin film from a hexamethyldisiloxane plasma can yield a glassy but hydrophobic surface (because of –CH₃ terminations) on top of a hydrophilic plastic, which can be useful for encapsulation or vapor barriers. In nanofabrication, plasma treatments are even used to selectively pattern hydrophobic vs hydrophilic regions on polymer microstructures for guided self-assembly of fluids.

Overall, plasma affords a high degree of control: by selecting gas type and parameters, one can increase a polymer’s surface energy by grafting polar groups (making it hydrophilic for better adhesion or biocompatibility), or decrease its surface energy by depositing low-energy chemistries (making it hydrophobic for anti-wetting or anti-fouling purposes). The molecular transformations – oxidation, nitridation, crosslinking, deposition – occur only in the top few nanometers of the material, so the bulk properties of the polymer (like transparency or strength) remain unchanged.

Vacuum vs. Atmospheric Plasma Treatments

Plasma treatments can be carried out at low pressure (vacuum chamber systems) or at atmospheric pressure (using plasma jets, corona, dielectric barrier discharges, etc.). Both approaches have their merits and limitations, and they can differ in the reactive species generated and practical applicability.

Vacuum (Low-Pressure) Plasma: This method involves placing the substrate in a sealed chamber, evacuating to a low pressure (e.g., 0.1–1 Torr), and initiating and sustaining the ionization of the process gas with RF or DC power. Low-pressure plasma is characterized by a longer mean free path of electrons/ions, which leads to a more uniform plasma environment and fewer collisions that quench reactive species. As a result, vacuum plasmas can be very uniform and controllable. For example, a classic RF glow discharge in oxygen at ~0.2 Torr will uniformly treat all exposed surfaces of samples in the chamber, including somewhat hidden or complex geometry areas, because the reactive species diffuse freely. The treatment is isotropic and can penetrate small crevices or pores to some extent. Vacuum plasmas are often used for batch processing: many parts or an entire wafer of devices can be treated together with consistent results. Another advantage is purity – one can use high-purity gases and the chamber wall conditions can be controlled, minimizing contamination​. Low-pressure plasmas are used extensively in semiconductor manufacturing (for photoresist stripping and surface cleaning) and in modifying medical devices and plastics (for example, treating catheter surfaces in a batch). The downside is the need for vacuum infrastructure (pumps, sealed chambers), which limits throughput for very large objects or continuous materials.

Atmospheric Plasma: Atmospheric-pressure plasma technology, by contrast, operates at or near ambient pressure, eliminating the need for a vacuum chamber​. Common forms include dielectric barrier discharges (DBD), plasma corona treaters, and atmospheric plasma jets. These typically use high voltage to ionize gas in a small region near the substrate. The plasma at atmospheric pressure often consists of numerous microdischarges or a plume that can be directed at a surface. Because the gas density is high, reactive species have much shorter lifetimes (lots of collisions and recombination), so the composition of active species can differ – for example, atmospheric air plasma may generate more transient species like ozone O₃ and NO_x that wouldn’t be present in the same way in a low-pressure plasma. The treatment with an atmospheric plasma is usually localized (e.g., a plasma jet a few millimeters wide scanning over a surface) rather than uniform over an entire large surface at once. However, by scanning or using arrays of jets, large areas can be covered. Atmospheric plasmas are well-suited for in-line continuous processes: for instance, a roll of polymer film can pass under a DBD treater to activate its surface for printing, or automotive parts can be plasma-treated on an assembly line just before painting​. They are also used for spot treatments, like treating a small region of a device prior to bonding.In terms of effectiveness, both vacuum and atmospheric plasmas can achieve similar levels of surface activation. Studies have shown that atmospheric-pressure plasma jets can introduce comparable functional groups on polymer surfaces as traditional low-pressure systems​. For example, Komasa et al. used a small atmospheric “piezobrush” plasma device on titanium and achieved superhydrophilic surfaces with increased –OH and no apparent structural damage​, much like low-pressure plasma would. One practical difference is that atmospheric plasmas tend to operate at higher instantaneous temperatures in the microdischarge filaments, which can cause localized heating or even small sparks on sensitive surfaces if not controlled, whereas low-pressure plasmas are typically a gentler, cooler glow. Atmospheric systems often add a stream of a particular gas (like a nitrogen jet or an air corona) – their composition might be less precisely controlled than a sealed vacuum mix.

Scalability and Applications: Atmospheric plasma wins out for large-scale and continuous treatment. It is commonly applied for treating sheets, fibers, or objects that are too large or awkward to vacuum process. For instance, plasma treating the interior of plastic tubing or the surface of wood or textiles is done at atmospheric pressure with specialized equipment​. Vacuum plasma, on the other hand, is ideal for precision and consistency – it’s the method of choice for microelectronic wafers, small medical implants, and research samples where uniformity and freedom from air contamination are paramount​. There are hybrid approaches as well, like in-line vacuum systems (a moving belt that goes through a low-pressure plasma region) and afterglow treatments (where substrates are kept just outside the main discharge to only expose them to long-lived radicals and UV).

To summarize, vacuum and atmospheric plasma techniques achieve the same fundamental goal – creating reactive species that modify a surface – but differ in practicality. Vacuum plasmas provide controlled, uniform treatment ideal for smaller or high-precision applications, while atmospheric plasmas enable high-throughput and in-situ processing for larger or continuous materials. Both are widely used in industry and research, and often, the choice comes down to the application scale and economic considerations rather than any major difference in the resulting surface chemistry​.

Reversibility and Aging of Plasma-Treated Surfaces

One challenge with plasma-induced surface activation is that the effects are not always permanent. Surfaces that are rendered hydrophilic by plasma often exhibit hydrophobic recovery (aging) over time – the water contact angle gradually increases as the surface “reverts” toward its pre-treatment state. Understanding this reversibility is important for practical use of plasma treatments, and strategies can be devised to slow or mitigate the aging.

Hydrophobic Recovery Mechanisms: The primary driving force for hydrophobic recovery is thermodynamic – the surface tends to rearrange or react to minimize its free energy. Plasma treatment introduces high-energy polar groups (–OH, –COOH, –NH₂, etc.) on polymer surfaces, but the underlying bulk polymer may still be hydrophobic. Over time, polymer chains or segments can reorient such that hydrophobic moieties (e.g. –CH₃ or phenyl groups) rotate or diffuse out to the surface, while polar groups are buried slightly inward​. This reorientation lowers the surface energy again, thus increasing the contact angle. Another related mechanism is the migration of low-molecular-weight (LMW) species: plasma can produce small fragmented oxidized molecules on the surface; these may be mobile and can diffuse away or evaporate, leaving behind less-polar material. In materials like PDMS, it’s known that plasma oxidation creates a silica-like brittle top layer, but below it, the elastomer’s hydrophobic polymer chains can migrate through cracks or diffuse to cover the new surface, restoring hydrophobicity. Additionally, environmental contamination plays a role: a highly hydrophilic surface will attract organic contaminants from the air (hydrocarbon chains from ambient air or handling), which deposit and lower the surface energy.

For metals or inorganic surfaces, hydrophobic recovery is usually due to the adsorption of airborne hydrocarbons – since metals and oxides don’t have polymer chains to reorient, they generally stay hydrophilic until something contaminates them. For example, a plasma-cleaned glass kept in a clean environment can remain hydrophilic for a long time, but if exposed to normal ambient air, within hours, it may pick up enough organic film to raise the contact angle noticeably.

Kinetics and Extent of Recovery: The rate and completeness of hydrophobic recovery vary widely by material and treatment. Some polymers regain most of their original hydrophobicity within hours or days (e.g. PDMS can go from ~0° contact angle right after O₂ plasma to ~90° within a day, and ~100+° in a week). Others reach a somewhat stable intermediate state. For instance, one study observed that plasma-treated polycarbonate and polyethylene tended to exhibit minimal hydrophobic recovery – possibly due to plasma-induced crosslinking that locks in polar groups​. In contrast, polystyrene or PDMS show more pronounced recovery because their chains are more mobile​. Jokinen et al. compared oxygen vs nitrogen plasma aging on 10 different polymers and found clear differences in recovery kinetics​. Generally, plasma treatments with higher energy (longer or more aggressive exposure) can implant more permanent functional groups or create a permanently roughened topology, but they can also cause more damage. Interestingly, nitrogen plasmas sometimes lead to slower hydrophobic recovery than oxygen plasmas​. This could be because nitrogen-containing groups (or the concomitant crosslinking) are less mobile or because oxygen-containing groups can further react or reorganize more easily. In PDMS, for example, nitrogen plasma gave a slightly less hydrophilic initial surface, but after a month the nitrogen-treated surface was still more hydrophilic than the fully recovered oxygen-treated one​.

Mitigation Strategies: There are several ways to extend the lifetime of plasma-induced wettability:

• Use Immediately: The simplest is to utilize the plasma-treated surface as soon as possible after treatment. Many industrial processes are designed so that bonding or painting occurs within minutes of the plasma activation, before significant aging occurs​. In microfluidics labs, for instance, researchers bond chips within a few minutes of plasma treatment to ensure strong adhesion.
• Surface Storage Environment: Storing samples in a controlled environment can slow recovery. For example, storing plasma-treated polymers in water can maintain their hydrophilicity for longer, because the polar groups stay hydrogen-bonded with water and are less free to reorient. In fact, PDMS surfaces will stay hydrophilic indefinitely if kept in water, but will rapidly recover once dried. Alternatively, storing in an inert atmosphere (nitrogen or vacuum) can prevent adsorption of contaminants, though reorientation can still occur internally. Some studies showed that samples stored under nitrogen recover more slowly than those stored in air​, due to the absence of hydrocarbon contamination.
• Plasma-Induced Stable Coatings: Rather than relying on plasma functionalization alone, one can deposit a permanent hydrophilic coating. For instance, plasma polymerization can create a thin network rich in polar groups that is covalently bonded to the surface, which resists reorientation. An example is plasma-deposited acrylic acid or allylamine films which present stable –COOH or –NH₂ functionalities. These coatings, if crosslinked, do not have the mobility to hide their polar groups, so they remain hydrophilic for long durations. In one study, electrospun PVDF (which is normally hydrophobic) was given a virtually permanent hydrophilic surface by a 2-minute oxygen plasma that created stable –C–F–O– and –C–O– groups; the water contact angle was still only 35° after two years of storage​. The authors attributed this stability to new functional moieties that did not easily migrate​.
• Crosslinking and Grafting: Introducing crosslinking can hinder molecular movement. Some plasma treatments intentionally use an inert gas pre-treatment to crosslink the surface, then an oxidative treatment to add polar groups. The crosslinked network is stiffer, so reorientation of polar fragments is slower. Also, grafting longer hydrophilic polymer brushes onto the surface (by initiating graft polymerization after plasma activation) can yield a permanently hydrophilic surface, albeit this goes beyond plasma alone.

Despite these strategies, it’s often unavoidable that plasma-activated surfaces will gradually lose some of their extreme wettability. For critical applications, device designers take this into account. For example, if a biomedical device needs to be plasma treated for cell culture, it might be treated immediately before use rather than treated at manufacture and stored. Or surfaces can be packaged in liquid to preserve their state. Research into fluorination or incorporation of stable polar groups is ongoing to create surfaces that maintain a desired wettability indefinitely.

In summary, aging of plasma-treated surfaces is primarily caused by rearrangement of the surface or minor contamination, as the system seeks a lower energy state​. While this hydrophobic recovery is a natural effect, its impact can be minimized by using the treated surfaces promptly or by employing additional processing steps to lock in the surface functionality. Awareness of this phenomenon is crucial when designing any process that relies on plasma surface activation.

Applications of Plasma-Induced Wettability Modification

The ability to switch a surface from hydrophobic to hydrophilic (or vice versa) using plasma treatment has unlocked numerous applications across science and engineering. Here we highlight a few areas – biomedical devices, Bio-MEMS/lab-on-chip, biofunctional coatings, and adhesion enhancement – where plasma-modified surfaces are enabling improved performance and new functionalities.

Biomedical Devices and Implants

In the biomedical realm, surface properties of materials often dictate biocompatibility. For instance, the integration of an implant with tissue, the adsorption of proteins, and the attachment of cells are all sensitive to surface chemistry and wettability. Plasma treatments are used to tune these properties:

• Improved Cell Adhesion and Osseointegration: As discussed earlier, titanium implant surfaces become superhydrophilic after appropriate plasma treatment (such as atmospheric air plasma)​. This superhydrophilicity correlates with enhanced adsorption of proteins like fibronectin or albumin from blood​, which in turn mediate cell attachment. Osteoblast cells (bone-forming cells) show greater adhesion and proliferation on hydrophilic titanium surfaces than on hydrophobic ones​. In vivo, such plasma-modified implants have been found to achieve faster osseointegration (bone bonding). Some commercial dental implants are plasma-treated and stored in isotonic solution to maintain hydrophilicity until implantation, promoting better initial bone cell responses.
• Reduced Thrombogenicity and Bacterial Adhesion: In some cases, making a surface more hydrophilic can reduce unwanted protein adsorption. Extremely hydrophilic, hydrated surfaces may resist fouling (the so-called “hydration layer” effect). Plasma-assisted coatings, such as plasma-polymerized poly(ethylene oxide) or other hydrogels, are used on blood-contacting devices to reduce platelet adhesion and thrombosis. On the other hand, certain applications benefit from making surfaces more hydrophobic: for example, long-term blood-contact catheters sometimes use hydrophobic coatings to reduce wetting and biofilm formation. Plasma can be used to graft fluorinated or siloxane coatings in those cases.
• Plasma-Enabled Drug/Biomolecule Coating: Plasma-functionalized surfaces are excellent primers for further biofunctionalization. A plasma-oxidized polymer with –COOH groups can be subsequently linked with peptides, enzymes, or growth factors using carbodiimide chemistry, creating a covalently bound bioactive surface​. For instance, plasma-treated PET may be coated with heparin to make an anticoagulant surface for vascular grafts. Because plasma activation is dry and sterile (plasma itself kills bacteria and removes organic impurities), it is an attractive first step in manufacturing of medical devices. It ensures good adhesion of any secondary coatings (antimicrobial films, lubricant coatings on needles, etc.).
• Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Porous polymer scaffolds used to grow tissue can be plasma-treated to enhance cell seeding. Polymers like poly(lactic acid) or poly(caprolactone) are frequently plasma treated (O_2 or N_2 plasma) to improve their wettability and introduce –NH_2 or –COOH groups that can immobilize cell-adhesive molecules (like RGD peptides). This results in better cell infiltration and proliferation in the scaffold​. One study on plasma-treated poly(lactic acid) noted that argon plasma gave a more long-lasting hydrophilicity than oxygen plasma, indicating potential advantages in using inert-gas plasma for scaffolds that might be stored before use​.

In summary, plasma surface modification in biomedical devices offers a clean, sterile, and effective way to optimize surfaces for biological interactions. Whether the goal is to encourage tissue integration (hydrophilic, functionalized surface) or to prevent biofouling (often via a specialized coating), plasma techniques are a key enabling technology.

Bio-MEMS and Lab-on-a-Chip Systems

Bio-MEMS (Biomedical Microelectromechanical Systems) and lab-on-a-chip devices are miniaturized systems often built from materials like silicon, glass, PDMS, and thermoplastics. Wettability is crucial in these devices because it affects microfluidic flow behavior, channel filling, and the ability to form stable droplets or interfaces. Plasma treatment is ubiquitous in this field:

• Microfluidic Channel Hydrophilization: PDMS, a popular material for microfluidic chips, is naturally hydrophobic, which can hinder aqueous solutions from filling microchannels. Oxygen plasma is routinely used to render PDMS surfaces hydrophilic by creating a silica-like oxide layer on them. This allows immediate filling of tiny channels by capillary action​. Additionally, plasma-treated PDMS can be irreversibly bonded to glass or another PDMS layer by bringing the activated surfaces together (the –OH groups condense to form Si–O–Si bonds, sealing the channel). However, as noted, PDMS hydrophilicity will decay (within minutes to hours)​, so often devices are plasma-bonded and then used quickly. Researchers have developed methods to re-plasma treat devices just before use or to line channels with more permanent hydrophilic coatings (sometimes by plasma-initiated polymerization of hydrophilic monomers).
• Capillary Flow and Wicking: In lab-on-chip assays, one often wants fluids to spontaneously wick through porous media or along surfaces. Plasma treatment of those surfaces (e.g. the surface of a paper microfluidic strip or a porous membrane) can greatly enhance wicking by making the surface water-loving. For example, plasma-treated cellulose or nitrocellulose membranes absorb sample fluids faster, which is beneficial for rapid diagnostic tests.
• Droplet Microfluidics: There are situations where one wants certain regions hydrophilic and others hydrophobic to control droplet formation and movement. Plasma can be used in a masked fashion to create patterned wettability. A classic technique is plasma treating a surface through a stencil or using a focused plasma jet to make only specific areas hydrophilic, leaving the rest hydrophobic. This patterning can guide droplets to specific locations or create virtual channels in open surfaces by confining liquid via hydrophobic borders​. Ohl and Schröder (1999) demonstrated plasma-induced chemical micropatterning to guide cell attachment on culture surfaces​– a similar concept can apply to fluid patterns.
• Bonding of Dissimilar Materials: Bio-MEMS devices often involve bonding plastics to silicon or glass (for example, bonding a polymer microfluidic chip to a glass slide with electrodes). Vacuum plasma treatment is a method to activate surfaces of polymers like COC (cyclic olefin copolymer), PMMA, or PC so that they can adhere or be glued strongly to other substrates​. Some microfluidic manufacturers use atmospheric plasma in assembly lines to treat and immediately press components together with an intermediate adhesive, achieving bonds that can withstand fluid pressure.

Overall, plasma techniques are an integral part of microfabrication and packaging of lab-on-chip systems, enabling control of surface interactions at the microscale that would be difficult to achieve otherwise.

Biofunctional Coatings and Surface Functionalization

Beyond just making a surface broadly hydrophilic or hydrophobic, plasma allows introduction of specific chemical functionalities that serve as anchor points for biomolecules or other coatings. This is critical in biosensors, diagnostic devices, and any application where one needs to immobilize a protein, DNA, or other bio-recognition element onto a device surface in a stable way.

• Introduction of Functional Groups for Coupling: As mentioned, O₂ plasma yields –COOH and –OH groups, while NH₃/N₂ plasma yields –NH₂ groups. These can be used to covalently attach biomolecules. For example, a glass slide given an ammonia-plasma can directly have glutaraldehyde applied, which binds to surface –NH₂ and presents aldehyde groups to capture proteins (through their lysine residues). Alternatively, one can plasma-activate a surface and then perform salinization (e.g. with 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane) to add a dense layer of amines – the plasma step ensures the silane chemisorbs well. Plasma functionalization thus acts as a primer layer for subsequent biofunctionalization chemistry.
• Plasma Polymerized Coatings with Embedded Functionality: A neat trick is plasma-polymerizing a monomer that itself contains a desired functional group. For instance, plasma polymerization of acrylic acid yields a nanometer-thin coating rich in –COOH groups. Unlike simple plasma oxidation, this coating can be very rich in a specific functionality and is covalently bonded to the substrate. Researchers have created amine-rich coatings by plasma polymerization of allylamine​, or used glycidyl methacrylate to get epoxy-functional surfaces for further chemistry. Because plasma polymerization can be done in a mild way (low substrate temperatures, in vacuum), one can coat even heat-sensitive biomaterials or devices with these films. Such coatings are employed in making biosensor chips where you want a uniform layer to attach, say, antibodies in an array format.
• Anti-Fouling Coatings: Biofunctional doesn’t always mean promoting bio-attachment; sometimes it means preventing nonspecific adsorption. Plasma can help deposit ultra-thin hydrogel-like coatings (e.g. from polyethylene glycol precursors) that resist protein adhesion. While grafting PEG by conventional means often requires wet chemistry, plasma allows a one-step deposition of a PEG-like coating by fragmenting and polymerizing a volatile precursor. The result is surfaces used in diagnostics that have specific “capture” spots (made active by plasma as above) surrounded by inert background (made non-fouling by another plasma polymer layer).
• Microarrays and Labware: Inside wells of assay plates or on slides, plasma treatments can make regions that selectively bind certain molecules. For example, the interior of ELISA microwells may be plasma treated to increase hydrophilicity, ensuring the coating solution spreads evenly and adsorbs in a uniform layer. Some commercial tissue culture plastics are treated with a specific plasma recipe to introduce a mix of carboxyl and nitrogen groups that optimize cell attachment and growth (often marketed as high-affinity or “treated” culture dishes). These are essentially polymer surfaces modified by plasma to present the right surface chemistry for proteins to adsorb in a cell-friendly orientation​.

Thus, plasma techniques enable a range of biofunctional surface coatings – from promoting cell growth to creating selective biosensing interfaces. The advantage is the coatings are typically covalently bound and very thin (nm scale), so they don’t leach or significantly alter dimensions, and they can often be applied in a solvent-free manner which maintains compatibility with sensitive biomolecules.

Enhancing Adhesion and Epoxy Bonding

One of the earliest and still most common uses of plasma treatment is to improve adhesion of paints, glues, and sealants to various surfaces. When bonding two dissimilar materials (say, a polymer to a metal) with an adhesive like epoxy, the surface energy of each substrate is a key factor. Adhesives spread and anchor better on high-surface-energy (hydrophilic) surfaces. Plasma treatment is used as a surface preparation step to ensure strong and durable bonds:

• Adhesive Bonding of Plastics: Many plastics (polyolefins, PTFE, etc.) are notoriously difficult to bond because of low surface energy. Plasma activation can make even polyethylene or polypropylene bondable by introducing polar groups. For example, plasma-treated polyethylene can go from a nearly non-wettable surface to one that water (or an epoxy resin) can wet easily​. The introduced oxygen or nitrogen groups can also form covalent or hydrogen bonds with the adhesive. In the case of epoxies, which often cure with amine or hydroxyl-containing hardeners, a plasma-oxidized plastic surface containing –COOH/–OH can chemically react or at least strongly hydrogen-bond with the adhesive matrix. TriStar Plastics reported that argon plasma treatment of polycarbonate generated surface peroxides that subsequently reacted with an epoxy-based adhesive to form covalent bonds at the interface​. The result is significantly higher lap-shear strength and reliability of the joint. Indeed, plasma treatment can obviate the need for chemical primers in many bonding processes​, which is attractive environmentally (no solvents) and for process simplicity.
• Paint and Coating Adhesion: In automotive and aerospace industries, plasma treating plastic or composite parts prior to painting has become common. For instance, polyolefin bumpers are plasma treated (often with an air plasma) to ensure paint adhesion instead of using a solvent-based primer. This improves paint longevity through weathering. In composite manufacturing, plasma is used to treat CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced polymer) surfaces before bonding or before applying adhesive films, achieving bonding strengths equal or greater than traditional sand-and-prime methods​. Metals can also be plasma treated before bonding to composites – aluminum or titanium surfaces plasma-cleaned will bond to polymers more strongly due to removal of weak boundary layers (oils, oxides) and insertion of polar groups.
• Epoxy Encapsulation: In electronics, epoxy resins are used to encapsulate devices. Plasma cleaning of the device surfaces (silicon, PCB, etc.) ensures the epoxy wets and adheres, preventing delamination that could let in moisture. This is critical for reliability. Plasma treatment of electronic packaging materials (like polyimide films, connectors) is a standard step to improve epoxy or silicone potting adhesion.
• Long-Term Stability: One interesting point is that for adhesion, the plasma effect need not be completely permanent; it just needs to last through the bonding process and cure. However, for high-stress bonds, a truly stable interface is desired. Plasma not only increases initial wettability but can create chemical bonds across the interface. By forming, for example, –C–O–C– bonds between a polymer surface and an epoxy, the failure mode shifts from interface failure to cohesive failure (meaning the bond is stronger than the materials around it). According to one study, even after some aging (hydrophobic recovery), plasma-treated composite surfaces still showed improved surface energy compared to untreated, and adhesive strength remained higher​. This suggests that even if slight recovery occurs, enough chemical change remains to benefit adhesion.

In all these scenarios, plasma surface treatment is a rapid (seconds to minutes) process that can replace harsher methods like chemical etching or high-temperature treatments. It creates a high-energy surface ready to bond, coat, or paint, thereby improving manufacturing yield and product performance. The scalability of plasma (especially atmospheric systems) means even large assemblies (like aircraft wings made of composites or continuous polymer films) can be treated just before bonding or finishing.

Conclusion

Plasma treatment methods provide a powerful and flexible approach for tailoring the surface energy of materials, offering a direct route to make surfaces hydrophilic or hydrophobic as needed. At the molecular level, plasma-generated ions, radicals, and photons can clean surfaces and graft new functional groups: metals like titanium and aluminum gain oxide/hydroxyl groups and lose contaminants, oxides like glass accumulate silanol groups, and polymers such as PC and PET acquire oxygen- or nitrogen-containing functionalities that drastically increase their wettability. By choosing different plasma gases and conditions, one can favor certain reactions – oxygen plasma for strong oxidation and hydrophilicity​, argon for gentle cleaning and physical activation​, nitrogen for amine-functionalization​, or specialized fluorocarbon plasmas for hydrophobic coatings​.

We compared vacuum and atmospheric plasmas, noting that while both can yield similar chemical outcomes​, they differ in operational scale and uniformity – a distinction that allows plasma technology to be applied from nanoscale devices to airplane fuselages. The phenomenon of hydrophobic recovery reminds us that plasma-induced changes often reside in a dynamic top few nanometers of a material. Nonetheless, through smart process design and sometimes additional coating steps, the benefits of plasma treatment can be preserved long enough to be practically useful or even permanently locked in.

The applications surveyed – from improved biomedical implants that integrate with the body​, to microfluidic chips that manipulate droplets with ease, to adhesive bonds in products that never fail at the interface – underscore how crucial surface energy modifications are in modern technology. Plasma treatment stands out because it is a dry, fast, and environmentally friendly technique (often reducing the need for wet chemicals). It enables manufacturers and researchers to fine-tune surface chemistry without altering bulk properties, something especially important for high-performance and delicate materials.

In conclusion, plasma surface modification has become an indispensable tool for creating hydrophilic or hydrophobic surfaces on demand. Ongoing research in plasma science continues to improve our understanding of surface interactions and to broaden the capabilities – for example, achieving even more durable superhydrophilic/superhydrophobic states​, or new plasma chemistries for specific functional group introduction. With this deepening knowledge, we can expect plasma techniques to play an ever-expanding role in surface engineering across scientific disciplines.

References

1. Friedrich, J. (2011). The Plasma Chemistry of Polymer Surfaces: Advanced Techniques for Surface Design. Wiley-VCH.
2. d’Agostino, R., Favia, P., Fracassi, F., & Palumbo, F. (2012). Plasma Processing of Polymers. In: Plasma Processes and Polymers, 9(3), 203–225.
3. Yasuda, H. (2005). Plasma Polymerization. Academic Press.
4. Morra, M., Occhiello, E., & Garbassi, F. (1990). Contact angle hysteresis on oxygen plasma treated polypropylene surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 137(1), 11–24.
5. Liston, E. M., Martinu, L., & Wertheimer, M. R. (1993). Plasma surface modification of polymers for improved adhesion: a critical review. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 7(10), 1091–1127.
6. Chan, C. M., Ko, T. M., & Hiraoka, H. (1996). Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons. Surface Science Reports, 24(1–2), 1–54.
7. Kralj, S., Smole, M. S., & Kleinschek, K. S. (2009). Influence of oxygen and nitrogen plasma treatment on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) polymers. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 94(10), 1561–1565.
8. Kim, M. S., et al. (2005). Surface modification of polycarbonate (PC) film using atmospheric pressure plasma. Surface and Coatings Technology, 193(1–3), 319–324.
9. Lee, H. J., et al. (2007). Effect of plasma treatment on Au–Au bonding for wafer-level MEMS packaging. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 17(3), 557.
10. Liu, X., Chu, P. K., & Ding, C. (2004). Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 47(3–4), 49–121.
11. Morra, M., et al. (2004). Superhydrophilicity of oxygen plasma-treated polystyrene surfaces. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 18(10), 1279–1293.
12. Friedrich, J. F., Mix, R., & Kühn, G. (2003). Surface activation and functionalization of polymers by plasma and UV irradiation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 208, 342–347.
13. Komasa, S., Taguchi, Y., Nishizaki, H., Sekino, T., & Okazaki, J. (2018). Application of atmospheric pressure plasma for titanium surface modification: effects on osteoblast-like cell behavior. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 88, 826–835.
14. Montazer, M., & Malek, R. M. A. (2007). Investigation on corona discharge plasma effects on polyamide fabrics: a study on the physical properties. Applied Surface Science, 253(5), 2070–2076.
15. Fridman, A. (2008). Plasma Chemistry. Cambridge University Press.
16. Jiang, S., & Cao, Z. (2010). Ultralow-fouling, functionalizable, and hydrolyzable zwitterionic materials and their derivatives for biological applications. Advanced Materials, 22(9), 920–932.
17. Gao, Y., et al. (2016). Durable superhydrophilic polymer nanofibrous membranes prepared by oxygen plasma for oil/water separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 8(41), 27579–27589.
18. Morent, R., et al. (2008). Plasma surface modification of biodegradable polymers: a review. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 5(3), 261–270.
19. Ohl, A., & Schröder, K. (1999). Plasma-induced chemical micropatterning for spatially controlled cell attachment. Biomaterials, 20(2), 89–93.
20. Ercan, B., Taylor, E., Alpaslan, E., & Webster, T. J. (2011). Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy. Nanotechnology, 22(29), 295102.
21. Poncin-Epaillard, F., & Debarnot, D. (2007). Surface functionalization of polymers by plasma techniques. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, 8(3), 104–122.
22. Choi, D. S., et al. (2011). Surface modification of thermoplastic materials with atmospheric-pressure air plasma for improved adhesion. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 25(13), 1583–1597.
23. Hnilica, J., Kudrle, V., & Tichy, M. (2011). Aging of plasma treated polymer surfaces. Vacuum, 85(9), 1091–1094.
24. Luan, B., et al. (2015). Bonding of thermoplastics using atmospheric pressure plasma. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 19(1), 211–220.
25. Jokinen, V., et al. (2008). Hydrophobic recovery of microfluidic device surfaces after oxygen plasma treatment. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 5(3), 443–447.
26. Bormashenko, E. (2013). Wettability at the Microscale: From Fundamentals to Current Applications. De Gruyter.
27. Morra, M., & Cassinelli, C. (1995). Oxygen plasma treatments of polymers: surface characterization and effects on endothelial cell adhesion. Biomaterials, 16(13), 1023–1029.
28. Grill, A. (1994). Cold plasma in materials fabrication: from fundamentals to applications. IEEE Press.
29. Vesel, A., & Mozetic, M. (2017). Surface modification and ageing of PMMA polymer by oxygen plasma treatment. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 50(29), 293002.
30. Bagheri, R., Lafitte, M., & Poncin-Epaillard, F. (2014). Durability of surface hydrophilization and chemical functionalization of polyethylene films using N2 plasma. Applied Surface Science, 317, 630–639.
31. Thomas, S., et al. (2013). Plasma Technology for Surface Functionalization of Biomaterials: Fundamentals and Applications. Wiley.
32. Blais, B. R., et al. (2007). Ageing effects on oxygen- and nitrogen-plasma-treated polymer surfaces. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 4(4), 386–393.

Click here to download this article